Over-Optimizing llms.txt: Will It Boost Your SEO?
TL;DR:
No. Over-optimizing your llms.txt file won't improve your SEO rankings today. While it's a promising idea for future AI readability, major search engines and AI tools don't use it as a signal. Done well, it's harmless. Done poorly, it could erode trust.
What Is an llms.txt File?
An llms.txt file is a Markdown-format text file placed at the root of your website. It serves as a curated content guide for Large Language Models (LLMs) like ChatGPT, Google Gemini, or Bing’s AI.
Unlike robots.txt, which tells crawlers what to avoid, llms.txt says:
"Hey, LLMs — here’s our best stuff. Ignore the noise."
A standard llms.txt file includes:
A short description of your website
A few key topic sections
Selected URLs with one-line summaries
Its goal? To help AI models quickly find your most valuable, trusted pages — not buried behind menus, ads, or CTAs.
Is llms.txt Used by Google or ChatGPT?
No.
Neither Google, Open AI, nor Anthropic (Claude) currently uses llms.txt in any official capacity.
Google has stated it's unnecessary for search indexing or rankings
OpenAI’s GPTBot rarely accesses these files
Bing and Perplexity haven’t formally adopted the standard either
That means adding or over-stuffing your llms.txt file won’t increase:
Rankings
Crawl rate
Indexation
Traffic
At best, it's ignored. At worst, it may send spam signals if misused.
Can llms.txt Help With AI Visibility?
Possibly — in the future.
In theory, if LLMs begin referencing llms.txt, your content might be easier to cite in AI answers. But that’s not how it works today. LLMs generate responses based on:
Your actual on-page HTML
The clarity and authority of the content itself
Internal linking and semantic structure
So while llms.txt sounds useful, AI models don’t rely on it (yet).
What Happens If You Over-Optimise llms.txt?
Here’s where some SEOs get too clever for their own good.
Over-optimising means:
Stuffing it with keywords
Adding too many links
Repeating pages under different sections
Misrepresenting content to trick AI
The risks:
No SEO gain — It doesn’t help, and wastes time
AI trust issues — LLMs may treat it like spam
Inaccurate AI answers — Misleading summaries = misquoted brand info
Competitor insight — You’re revealing your best content strategy in one file
In short: it’s a bit like keyword-stuffing in 2008. It may feel smart. It’s not.
Best Practices for Using llms.txt (Without Overdoing It)
If you do want to experiment with llms.txt, here’s how to do it right:
Be selective – Highlight your best pages only
Use plain Markdown – Headings, bullets, clear summaries
Keep it honest – Descriptions must match actual page content
Update regularly – Especially after publishing major new content
Don’t keyword-stuff – Write for a human reader (or a cautious AI)
It should feel like a table of contents, not a marketing brochure.
How Do You Make a llms.txt File?
Super simple. Here's a quick guide:
Open a plain text editor
Add an H1 header (e.g. # MySite.com)
Write a 1–2 sentence description of your site
Break your key content into sections with H2s (## Guides, ## Products, etc.)
Under each, list links in Markdown with short summaries:
## Guides
- [Beginner’s SEO Guide](https://yoursite.com/seo-guide): Covers on-page and technical SEO for 2024
- [Analytics Setup](https://yoursite.com/analytics): Google Analytics 4 step-by-step walkthrough
Save as llms.txt
Upload to your root domain: https://yoursite.com/llms.txt
Done.
What Are LLMs Actually Looking For?
When LLMs fetch your site, they’re scanning for:
Clear, structured content
Authoritative tone and factual accuracy
Minimal distractions (ads, popups, auto-play videos)
Up-to-date information
Natural semantic signals (headings, schema, internal links)
So the best thing you can do — with or without llms.txt — is produce content that genuinely answers questions.
Final Thoughts: A Map Without a Reader (Yet)
Right now, llms.txt is like writing a beautifully detailed treasure map... without knowing if anyone's going to read it.
Is it worth having? Sure — as a low-effort experiment or internal tool. But don’t treat it like a secret SEO weapon. It won’t move your rankings, and overloading it might even backfire.
Focus on the fundamentals: great content, a clear structure, and a site that serves real human users.
For those exploring AI-focused SEO, answer engine optimization might be a better place to invest your time.
And if you’re refining your content architecture or internal linking strategy, you might find this breakdown on content hubs useful too.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
-
A simple Markdown file that highlights key pages on your site for AI tools. It’s like a curated sitemap for LLMs.
-
robots.txt blocks or allows crawler access. llms.txt recommends content but doesn’t control access.
-
No. There is currently no official support or adoption.
-
Not directly. It has no impact on rankings, indexing, or traffic.
-
No. Only include pages that offer real value — detailed guides, product explainers, FAQs, etc.
-
Yes. Markdown is the preferred format.
-
Possibly in the future, but there’s no evidence it matters now.
-
Whenever your best content changes. Treat it like a live content map.
Anthony Yang
Hi, I’m Anthony, the founder of Elescend Marketing. Over the past three years, I’ve worked with more than 35 small businesses across North America.
Today, I lead a highly skilled SEO team and work closely with small businesses to help them reach the first page of Google and build steady organic traffic within six months. My focus is on delivering real, measurable results, not empty promises. Visit my LinkedIn profile.